http://www.omnitrace.com/birth-family.html
Birth-First Parent Blog

03/30/07

Only Two Kinds of Birth Mothers? - Part 2

Posted by : Jan Baker in Birth-First Parent Blog at 12:26 pm , 649 words, 276 views  
Categories: On Motherhood


The opposite extreme from the happy birth mother is the angry or sad birth mother. She makes many people highly uncomfortable and in an open adoption can really can ruin the happy mood of the adoptive family. I wonder how many adoptions close because an angry or sad birth mother dampens the mood in the adoptive family? Some adoptive moms go the extra mile when a birth mom is having a difficult time - I do know that is the case. Read some of Deb's blogs if you need proof of that.

Reunited birth moms are often REALLY angry, and can be a thorn in the side to many adoptive parents. They talk too much about pain, injustices, coercion and all sorts of ugly truths in adoption. Some people find it easy to dismiss their voices as extreme and not the majority opinion. However,it is getting harder to do that as more birth mothers come out, reunite, and yes, speak out.

SPONSOR
http://www.omnitrace.com/Birth-Family.html

The truth is that birth mothers come in more than two varieties, happy or angry/sad. Most birth mothers are complex people with full, interesting and "normal" lives. They are not all happy or all sad; it just isn't that simple. I believe that super "happy" birth mothers have not processed or acknowledged their loss. A woman can be happy as a birth mother, but an all-happy birth mother is oblivious to her loss, and probably has not processed it yet. As Heather said, the stereotypical happy birth mother can be dangerous because she sends a faulty message that placing your child for adoption is simply swell.

I know so many extraordinary and successful birth mothers with good lives. However, even most of them still have times when their adoption woes torment them. How much adoption affects a person varies, but it is unrealistic to expect that it would not often have serious effects. That does not mean that birth mothers are all wimpy cry-babies who never enjoy their lives. Some can and do - others cannot seem to find ways to heal and achieve some resolution.

For some birth mothers, especially those in the reform community, adoption is a significant aspect of their life. That does not mean that they are not highly functioning women who enjoy warm relationships with people in their lives. To lump birth mothers into either the happy or angry category does not work. Although it may be an easy way to classify birth mothers, it is not accurate and does not give a realistic portrait of the majority of birth mothers.

I do not even like the use of the term "happy" as a label to attach to birth mothers. Somehow it seems wrong to expect or endorse the whole idea of happy and clueless birth mothers. Can only clueless birth mothers be blissfully happy all the time? Yes, that is what I believe. Can a birth mother process her loss, achieve some healing and have a good life with some happy times? Yes, definitely, but the loss never completely evaporates. Losing a child to adoption changes a women forever. It takes away her innocence and some of the sheer joy of life. Many birth moms can recover, heal and have good lives. However, the scars remain, and sadness resurfaces even for those of us strong enough to fight for that good life.

For a long time, I kept expecting to become totally healed and recovered. There were moments when I thought that I had succeeded. Yet, I finally have come to the realization that the wound will never completely heal. The sadness will recede for awhile, but reminders will bring it back without warning. For me, that is the reality. I have accepted my fate, and embrace the good times.

Thanks to all the commenters on part 1, you have helped focus and clarify my points and I appreciate your input!



Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: oneofakind [Member] Email
I completely disagree with the sadness part of giving up your own child. Yes there is a lot of pain, but the comfort lies in the fact that you gave your child a way better life than you feel you could give. My son is 19, we were reunited when he was 11, no tears just a growing family! I had a daughter 4 years after he was born and told her a year before being contacted she had a brother. We spent weekends together and got to know each other, but we all knew who his real parents were, the ones who shared not only the fun times but also the bad ones. I am so proud of my decision, and would not change a thing. I was also adopted, found my birth Dad 5 months too late, he died. Just found my birth Mom, she wants nothing to do with me, by the way I was born on Mother's Day. Open adoption is the only true way to bring healing to the birth Mom's sense of loss. She always knows who her baby is with and that she would be contacted in case anything happened.
PermalinkPermalink 03/30/07 @ 14:22
Comment from: Jan Baker [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
Most mothers of closed adoptions have no comfort because they do not know whether their child actually had a better life or not. Many in reunion realize that their children did not have a good life, or that even if they did, it might have been better had they raised them. In fact, you never really know what could have been - better or worse.

I agree that open adoptions provide some healing that closed ones do not. Also, reuniting when a child is 11 years old and gets to know other siblings is quite a different experience than reuniting when your child is in their 30's or older.

Adoption probably has been a better experience for you than me or many women I know, partially due to your early reunion and so much access to your son. I am glad you feel at peace with your decision, but in my experience that makes you the exception, not the rule. Birth mothers do have differing reactions to their loss.
PermalinkPermalink 03/30/07 @ 14:46
Comment from: Heather Lowe [Member] Email · http://unplanned-pregnancy.adoptionblogs.com/
Oneofakind,
You wrote:
"...comfort lies in the fact that you gave your child a way better life than you feel you could give. "

But what if the result was completely neutral? My child does *not* have a better life as a result of the adoption. He has a different one. I don't think anyone judging the two potential lives side by side would be able to say unequivocally that one is "better."

You are correct in that many birthmothers do gain real benefits for their child through surrender, and that they can potentially feel good about that fact. However, situations like that aren't the total picture. Plenty of birthmothers never should have surrendered in the first place, because they already had much to offer. Where's the comfort there?
PermalinkPermalink 03/30/07 @ 14:54
Comment from: Jenna Hatfield [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
I completely disagree with the sadness part of giving up your own child. Yes there is a lot of pain, but the comfort lies in the fact that you gave your child a way better life than you feel you could give.

Oneofakind; and I COMPLETELY disagree with your statement. While I was coerced into thinking that I was giving her a better life, there is absolutely, 100% no truth to that statement. Looking at my life since her placement, she would have been 100% just as fine if she was parented in my family. Let's not tell other birth mother's how to feel. Thanks.
PermalinkPermalink 03/30/07 @ 15:04
Comment from: John [Member] Email
Jan, as usual, you are able to cover different possibilities even-handedly. No contact until the child is in his 30s leaves a lot of years not knowing. I wonder if it is in someway similar to what parents go through when a child is snatched. That would be very hard to accept.

I am puzzled at the birth mothers who insist on venting their anger with the adoptive parents and their birth child. Do they think they have an exemption to behave badly with other people? Do they think there can be no consequenses to them for being so inconsiderate to the very people they now want to have contact with? Therapists exist for a reason. To put it the way the military does, 'don't crap in your own mess kit'.

Jenna, I don't understand your second to last sentence. Are you talking about your life, or your birth child's life?

Thanks Jan
John
PermalinkPermalink 03/30/07 @ 15:22
Comment from: jpdakota [Member] Email
You know, living in the subjunctive mood is simply not possible. There is no way to predict how something (or someone) may have turned out had things been different. Things weren't different. What happens happens. That's all there is.
PermalinkPermalink 03/30/07 @ 20:22
Comment from: Jan Baker [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
John, I love your military lines, they're great.

jpdakota - While I agree that there is no 100% accurate way to know how things might have been, there are plenty of signs that give good indications. When birth mothers have other children and are good parents, I think often you can make an argument that they probably had the ability to parent the children they relinquished. Not always, but often.

I do not agree that "what happens happens" and that it should be ignored. We learn from the past and I think that is why it is important to review it sometimes. Plus, we can help others benefit from what we learn.
PermalinkPermalink 03/30/07 @ 22:27
Comment from: jpdakota [Member] Email
I didn't say it should be ignored. I said you cannot change the past. So, unless you have a time machine, what happens happens. There are lots of people who spend their lives in remorse and regret over decisions made long ago. That is a futile process and is wasted energy. Self-incrimination is painful. You cannot change what has already transpired.
PermalinkPermalink 03/31/07 @ 09:55
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

http://www.omnitrace.com

Misc

Subscribe to Birth-First Parent Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 84