<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Offensive Tip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/weblogs/offensive-tip/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/weblogs/offensive-tip</link>
	<description>A blog for and about parents who have placed a child for adoption.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:02:45 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: clareb</title>
		<link>http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/weblogs/offensive-tip/comment-page-1#comment-1693</link>
		<dc:creator>clareb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birth-first.www.adoptionblogs.com/2008/05/27/offensive-tip#comment-1693</guid>
		<description>Jodilee I&#039;m glad your open adoption is &lt;br /&gt;
working out well but the fact that it &lt;br /&gt;
is says more about your own personal&lt;br /&gt;
honor than it does about your agency.  &lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;ve been researching this subject for &lt;br /&gt;
about two years and there seem to be a&lt;br /&gt;
lot of people who just don&#039;t want to &lt;br /&gt;
wait four or five years to find the &lt;br /&gt;
elusive &quot;Juno&quot; who actually wants a&lt;br /&gt;
closed adoption so they promise someone&lt;br /&gt;
an open adoption which they have no &lt;br /&gt;
intention of honoring and legally, once&lt;br /&gt;
the ink is dry they don&#039;t have to.  Now&lt;br /&gt;
apparently these would be adoptors are &lt;br /&gt;
saying that they didn&#039;t pay the bill,&lt;br /&gt;
didn&#039;t see the waitress and didn&#039;t intend&lt;br /&gt;
it for her personally but just slipped&lt;br /&gt;
the card in with the check.  This &lt;br /&gt;
probably is true, but, it demonstrates &lt;br /&gt;
what a terrible idea this fishing for &lt;br /&gt;
babies is.  Remember Paul Newman in &quot;The &lt;br /&gt;
Verdict&quot; showing up at funerals with his&lt;br /&gt;
personal injury business card?  Anyone&lt;br /&gt;
who hands these adoption cards out can&lt;br /&gt;
only expect a similar reaction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jodilee I&#8217;m glad your open adoption is <br />
working out well but the fact that it <br />
is says more about your own personal<br />
honor than it does about your agency.  <br />
I&#8217;ve been researching this subject for <br />
about two years and there seem to be a<br />
lot of people who just don&#8217;t want to <br />
wait four or five years to find the <br />
elusive &#8220;Juno&#8221; who actually wants a<br />
closed adoption so they promise someone<br />
an open adoption which they have no <br />
intention of honoring and legally, once<br />
the ink is dry they don&#8217;t have to.  Now<br />
apparently these would be adoptors are <br />
saying that they didn&#8217;t pay the bill,<br />
didn&#8217;t see the waitress and didn&#8217;t intend<br />
it for her personally but just slipped<br />
the card in with the check.  This <br />
probably is true, but, it demonstrates <br />
what a terrible idea this fishing for <br />
babies is.  Remember Paul Newman in &#8220;The <br />
Verdict&#8221; showing up at funerals with his<br />
personal injury business card?  Anyone<br />
who hands these adoption cards out can<br />
only expect a similar reaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jodilee0123</title>
		<link>http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/weblogs/offensive-tip/comment-page-1#comment-1692</link>
		<dc:creator>jodilee0123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 03:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birth-first.www.adoptionblogs.com/2008/05/27/offensive-tip#comment-1692</guid>
		<description>Okay. . .when we went through our training for our first adoption (we worked with a lawyer run agency)--they did go over marketing techniques and leaving a card such as this was discussed.  Being the person that I am, I would like to believe that this couple was leaving their card everywhere they went and weren&#039;t specifically targeting the server. . . but sometimes my world isn&#039;t reality.  I think it is tacky anyway--but sometimes people just don&#039;t see it that way.  They think any possibility of a connection is worth a try.  But the whole &quot;code&quot; thing kind of runs with people who get a separate 800 number to put in their profiles. Why not give your home number?  And don&#039;t give me the reason that you want them to call without it costing them anything.  They can call collect. . .or most likely know someone with a cell phone with free long distance.  When we started our second process of adoption we chose to go with another agency that better fit our family and our strong feelings toward open adoption.  Our main concern was special care for birthparents.  Making sure they get adequate and truthful counseling and help them through the ups and downs AFTER placement too! We paid a &quot;lifetime&quot; counseling fee at the first agency and they never followed up with our son&#039;s birthmom pretty much after the adoption was final.  I&#039;m so happy that our relationship ended up thriving--or it could have been another nightmare story.  Anyone who sees our profile now--sees our address and home phone number. Now, we choose to not advertise publically on a website or anything--so, I suppose putting your number and address out there for everyone to see is risky. What a huge RED FLAG for anyone who may be looking for a family.  Anyway. . . our agency now is so AWESOME that they have welcomed our son&#039;s birthmom into their family too and she is free to participate in any service, activity, whatever--whenever she chooses.  That says a lot and means more than anyone can know for us and her.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So back to the marketing.  It&#039;s not for us and I do think it is tacky--but everyone is different and ultimately it is the expectant parent&#039;s choice.  I am so naive, I guess and never even thought about the whole ring thing.  I had a loose prong once and didn&#039;t wear mine for almost a year--so I never even think to look at people&#039;s hands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, the bulletin board thing mentioned above. . .I guess that isn&#039;t so bad as it is anonymous and not targeted towards anyone specifically.  Or just talking about it with people you know--in a kind loving manner. . .not solicitation.  And lastly. . . I hoped they checked to see if doing something like that is in compliance with their state laws as some do not allow &quot;advertising&quot;.  All I have to say is I&#039;m glad I&#039;m not them right now! :0)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay. . .when we went through our training for our first adoption (we worked with a lawyer run agency)&#8211;they did go over marketing techniques and leaving a card such as this was discussed.  Being the person that I am, I would like to believe that this couple was leaving their card everywhere they went and weren&#8217;t specifically targeting the server. . . but sometimes my world isn&#8217;t reality.  I think it is tacky anyway&#8211;but sometimes people just don&#8217;t see it that way.  They think any possibility of a connection is worth a try.  But the whole &#8220;code&#8221; thing kind of runs with people who get a separate 800 number to put in their profiles. Why not give your home number?  And don&#8217;t give me the reason that you want them to call without it costing them anything.  They can call collect. . .or most likely know someone with a cell phone with free long distance.  When we started our second process of adoption we chose to go with another agency that better fit our family and our strong feelings toward open adoption.  Our main concern was special care for birthparents.  Making sure they get adequate and truthful counseling and help them through the ups and downs AFTER placement too! We paid a &#8220;lifetime&#8221; counseling fee at the first agency and they never followed up with our son&#8217;s birthmom pretty much after the adoption was final.  I&#8217;m so happy that our relationship ended up thriving&#8211;or it could have been another nightmare story.  Anyone who sees our profile now&#8211;sees our address and home phone number. Now, we choose to not advertise publically on a website or anything&#8211;so, I suppose putting your number and address out there for everyone to see is risky. What a huge RED FLAG for anyone who may be looking for a family.  Anyway. . . our agency now is so AWESOME that they have welcomed our son&#8217;s birthmom into their family too and she is free to participate in any service, activity, whatever&#8211;whenever she chooses.  That says a lot and means more than anyone can know for us and her.   </p>
<p>So back to the marketing.  It&#8217;s not for us and I do think it is tacky&#8211;but everyone is different and ultimately it is the expectant parent&#8217;s choice.  I am so naive, I guess and never even thought about the whole ring thing.  I had a loose prong once and didn&#8217;t wear mine for almost a year&#8211;so I never even think to look at people&#8217;s hands.  </p>
<p>So, the bulletin board thing mentioned above. . .I guess that isn&#8217;t so bad as it is anonymous and not targeted towards anyone specifically.  Or just talking about it with people you know&#8211;in a kind loving manner. . .not solicitation.  And lastly. . . I hoped they checked to see if doing something like that is in compliance with their state laws as some do not allow &#8220;advertising&#8221;.  All I have to say is I&#8217;m glad I&#8217;m not them right now! :0)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happygmom</title>
		<link>http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/weblogs/offensive-tip/comment-page-1#comment-1691</link>
		<dc:creator>happygmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 01:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birth-first.www.adoptionblogs.com/2008/05/27/offensive-tip#comment-1691</guid>
		<description>People who think it is acceptable to leave these solicitation cards in public places make my skin crawl.  Having helped my daughter and a niece overcome the trauma of being solicited for their babies in public places, I know that this kind of networking is not harmless and clearly shows lack of human compassion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In my opinion, these people score negative on the sensitivity scale and clearly demonstrate that they do not have the qualifications to be fit parents.  Talk about a Big RED Rejection Flag!!  This one takes the prize!&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who think it is acceptable to leave these solicitation cards in public places make my skin crawl.  Having helped my daughter and a niece overcome the trauma of being solicited for their babies in public places, I know that this kind of networking is not harmless and clearly shows lack of human compassion.</p>
<p>In my opinion, these people score negative on the sensitivity scale and clearly demonstrate that they do not have the qualifications to be fit parents.  Talk about a Big RED Rejection Flag!!  This one takes the prize!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chromesthesia</title>
		<link>http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/weblogs/offensive-tip/comment-page-1#comment-1690</link>
		<dc:creator>Chromesthesia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 18:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birth-first.www.adoptionblogs.com/2008/05/27/offensive-tip#comment-1690</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s seriously just WRONG. On all sorts of levels. They can&#039;t find some other way to adopt? Like, I don&#039;t know, an ethical agency or something?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, folks will really look dirty at a pregnant woman not wearing a ring? What is this, A Tree Grows in Brooklyn? (one of the books I&#039;m reading.) There&#039;s some churches (Seventh Day Adventist) who don&#039;t believe in wearing rings, at least my relatives don&#039;t. Talk about making assumptions...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s seriously just WRONG. On all sorts of levels. They can&#8217;t find some other way to adopt? Like, I don&#8217;t know, an ethical agency or something?</p>
<p>
Also, folks will really look dirty at a pregnant woman not wearing a ring? What is this, A Tree Grows in Brooklyn? (one of the books I&#8217;m reading.) There&#8217;s some churches (Seventh Day Adventist) who don&#8217;t believe in wearing rings, at least my relatives don&#8217;t. Talk about making assumptions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KatjaMichelle</title>
		<link>http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/weblogs/offensive-tip/comment-page-1#comment-1689</link>
		<dc:creator>KatjaMichelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 14:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birth-first.www.adoptionblogs.com/2008/05/27/offensive-tip#comment-1689</guid>
		<description>Seen much debate over this recently and no matter how hard I try I just can&#039;t see the other side.  I can&#039;t imagine it ever being ok to give a pregnant woman one of these cards.  Leaving a notice on a bulletin board is more acceptable to me. Although it still leaves me feeling uneasy I can see how &quot;advertising&quot; is necessary to find a non-agency placement but...uh I just don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seen much debate over this recently and no matter how hard I try I just can&#8217;t see the other side.  I can&#8217;t imagine it ever being ok to give a pregnant woman one of these cards.  Leaving a notice on a bulletin board is more acceptable to me. Although it still leaves me feeling uneasy I can see how &#8220;advertising&#8221; is necessary to find a non-agency placement but&#8230;uh I just don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
