http://www.omnitrace.com/birth-family.html
Birth-First Parent Blog

04/11/07

When to Use the Term "Birthmother"

Posted by : Jan Baker in Birth-First Parent Blog at 09:40 am , 426 words, 214 views  
Categories: Birth/First Parents and Language


Some women who have relinquished babies to adoption, might say that you should never use the term, "birthmother." However, that is a whole other discussion. In this post, I am referring to using the term "birthmother" inappropriately before a woman has placed a child for adoption, or in some cases, even given birth yet.

Until a man is convicted of a felony, he is not a felon. Likewise, until a new mother signs on the dotted line relinquishing all rights to her baby or child, she is never a "birthmother." Before anyone asks, no, I am not comparing birth mothers to felons! It is a simple analogy,and I am going to run with it.

A man considers committing some sort of crime. If caught and convicted, he might become a convicted felon. On the other hand, if the man only thinks about acting on his criminal intents, he is a person with bad thoughts and nothing more. Call him a felon wannabe if you would like. However, by no stretch of the imagination is it fair to brand this guy a felon. Considering an act and actually carrying it out are clearly not the same. It would be grossly unfair to call someone a felon because they considered an act that might make them one.

SPONSOR
http://www.omnitrace.com/Birth-Family.html

Likewise, a mother deserves the same consideration. A pregnant women is never a birth mother, nor is a mother who has not relinquished a baby to adoption. Labeling either of them a "birthmother" prematurely is a bad practice for many reasons. I won’t go into a long spiel about this, most of you know. However, it is disrespectful and potentially coercive to slap the birth mother label onto a pregnant woman. If she begins to see herself and think of herself as a birth mother, changing her mind later will be that much harder. Hmm, I was bright enough to figure that out, think adoption social workers have not?

This may seem like a small point to some, but it really is important. A pregnant women should never experience any type of pressure to relinquish, subtle or otherwise. The birth mother label can be part of boxing her into a corner, and that should never happen.

As a matter of respect, I would also caution adoptive parents not to call their children's birth mother "our" birth mother. She is your child's birth mother, not yours. To call her "yours" is considered highly insulting to many birth mothers. Okay, I am jumping off my soapbox - for now at least!







Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: dw5 [Member] Email
I have read a lot about this on this forum as well as other blogs on the internet. I am surprised that Adoption.com has not made any moves to change their forum categories so that when pregnant women come here looking for support and advice regarding a possible adoption, they don't have to click on a forum entitled "Birthparents" to get to the unplanned pregnancy support forum. I guess it's not just the adoption social workers using the wrong terminology!
PermalinkPermalink 04/16/07 @ 11:28
Comment from: rsm2004 [Member] Email
With all due resect, a birthparent is what you will be after you reliquish your child.I agreed you should not lable anyone before the fact, but in order to be clear as to what the goal of the Adoption.com and similar web information is , I cannot say I can think of a more appropriate name. As an Adoptive Mom, I personally cring at the First Parent label.As if I did not feel " second rate" enough, at the beginning of the process.But I digress:- You clearly are an articulate person but not everyone is so insightful as to the particular semantics of the prefix- "Birth" .
Being labled an Adoptive Mom,is not exactely warm and fuzzy in the beginning either. Most of us are very reluctant to be chalked up to that category when we start looking for our alternatives. An as for me personally : I envy birth parents because I will never have that label.Let's be honest,neither category- Birth or Adoptive mothers/fathers in their heart of hearts want to "be here"- having to find solutions to a difficult situation.In most cases, before we Adoptive moms become Adoptive moms we had dreams of giving birth, of passing on our genes and "be normal", to experience what every other woman in the world seems to have a natural right to...We all just want to be referred to as Mothers--
PermalinkPermalink 06/22/07 @ 14:35
Comment from: petebelle [Member] Email
I disagree with rms2004. While it may be true that some people do not want to be in the situation where they have no choice but to form a family through adoption, not all adoptive parents feel that way. I am very proud to be an adoptive mother. I could (through some very extensive medical intervention) probably carry a child and give birth, but we have chosen to build a family through adoption and cannot have been more blessed. My daughter may not carry my genes but I am a very "normal" mother. We came to know a very special person through the grace of God and she gave us the greatest gift of all, a Child. I can only pray that we will be so lucky as to find another equally special person to bless us with a second child. I do not feel "second rate" at the thought of calling that person my daughter's first mother because that is exactly who she is no one can take that away from her.
PermalinkPermalink 08/20/07 @ 11:37
Comment from: Daniella Ashburn [Member] Email
Dear Petebelle,

I think we are digressing from what I meant to address in my initial response but I'm happy to reply to your post.
Let me start by saying I too am as "normal as they come" in the mother category, but I - personally-would be dishonest if I did not admit to having felt, initially, somewhat envious and different from my friends how never had to contemplate all these difficult and different adoption issues.
I think it is great that you and your husband have chosen to build a family through adoption and I understand what you are saying. And while many adoptions are infant adoptions, where the birthparents actually made a conscious choice , an adoption plan, to give their child what they realized they could not. And as adoptions go , these kind of adoptions are what most of us hope for, informed decissions and voluntary reliquishments, and possibly some degree of post adoption contact. But , many adoptions do not happen that way. What if your child was taken away from his/her mother because of abuse, neglect and or other circumstances that made it impossible and dangerous to leave the child with the birth mother? What if she already had 7 children, all of them taken away at one point or an other? I find it hard to conjure up the image of a "special person" and God's grace in any of this. I will never speak ill of my son's birth parents but I will also not lie about the involuntary nature of his adoptive placement.
At heart , I truely believe"each to their own" but I also know that children are very literal and by refering to my son's birth parents as his "first parents", I fear I would be creating more confusion than clarity.

I wish you all of God's grace good will to grant you another wonderful and fulfilling adoption experience.

RSM2004

PermalinkPermalink 08/26/07 @ 22:46
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Misc

Subscribe to Birth-First Parent Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Julie
  • Guest Users: 98