Birth-First Parent Blog

09/24/07

Book Review: B-Mother

Posted by : Jenna Hatfield in Birth-First Parent Blog at 08:11 am , 882 words, 354 views  
Categories: Books
I don't often hold much hope for novels written about the birth parent experience. Fiction leaves room for exaggeration and personal opinion and so I try to go into reading with an open mind. My mind was blown by B-Mother by Maureen O'Brien (2007). While, in the end, some loose ends tie up too neatly, I think this is one of the best fictional books I've read on adoption and the birth parent experience.

The main character, Hillary, finds herself pregnant at the beginning of her junior year of high school (1981). Only sixteen years of age, she is familiar with grief and loss as her older brother died during an unfortunate hazing event in college four years prior. Her parents, still overwhelmed with the loss of a child, send her off to a maternity home -slash- convent to spend the duration of her pregnancy.

Hillary is able to search through profiles and choose the parents for her unborn child. The descriptions of the actual process during this time and her accompanying emotions are superbly spot-on, sadly so. While the social worker tells her that she isn't being forced to place, no parenting options are ever provided. Instead, she's given profile after profile with sickeningly sweet letters addressed, inappropriately, to the "birthmother."

Most heart-wrenching was the description of the physical relinquishment of her son. Vivid in description and heavy in emotion, the author makes the reader see and feel the depth of the moment. For those who have actually placed a child for adoption, this particular point at the end of part one might be somewhat overwhelming. Others may find it surprising, enlightening or saddening. In my readings thus far, I find it to hit some more real spots of the exchange, above and beyond what other books have accomplished.

This part, just as Hillary is leaving the hospital, struck me. Deeply.

I knew he was Lola's now. I began kissing Tom's sleeping face. He yawned. I kissed him again and again and again. He sighed and kept dozing. "This isn't goodbye," I sobbed. I lifted him up, and placed him into Lola's long, spotted arms.

It happens all the time.

I grabbed the big blue balloon from the wheelchair, snapped it off, and began to run, sore nipples chafing, swear pouring, legs buckling under me. Shell and I squealed out of the parking lot, tires laying a long hot patch. I needed a quick getaway, as if I were a criminal.

SPONSOR
http://www.omnitrace.com/Birth-Family.html


We then follow Hillary through her grief process, which friends and family don't seem to understand. The parents she chose for her son keep their promise and send pictures and letters every year on his birthday. Hillary goes off to college and faces the choices of whether or not to share her role as a birth mother with those closest to her. Those choices follow her as she heads off to start her own life after college. The fears described as she weighs the decision each time speak true to what many birth mothers experience.

The book picks up again when her son reaches the age of eighteen and sends a letter. After some back-and-forth writing, they decide to meet in person. Things, happily, go well. However, that doesn't mean that some of these meetings aren't fraught with heavy questions and emotional exchanges. While I am not a birth mother from the closed era and thus have no experience with reunion, I can imagine that some of the questions she is asked by her son are quite common. I also found this particular section, though much more fast-paced than any other reunion I've ever heard or read about, to be mostly realistic.

The book ends with an exchange between mothers that warmed my heart. This, of course, may be the most far-fetched aspect of the book. While the exchange of letters and pictures may place this adoption into the realms of openness for some people, the truth remains that this was a closed adoption. For the mothers to get along so well, so quickly is a bit of a stretch even though Hillary did choose her son's parents. It was nice to read, of course, but not incredibly realistic.

All in all, I loved this book. I read it in two short days. Knowing that she would relinquish her child, I read quickly through the end of part one. At that point, I had to put the book down for the rest of the evening. I was emotionally spent. However, after a good night's sleep, I picked the book up the next morning and read it through the end. (Or, you know, read it through the end with appropriately timed interruptions from husbands and children.) I would recommend this book to anyone searching for a good novel. Do beware that there are issues of adoption (obviously), drug use, death, grief, unethical adoption practices, sex (not graphic, just issues dealing with sex), and other inter-relational problems that others might find triggering.

//
For more book reviews, read:

1. Lifegivers: A Wrap-Up - August/September 2007.

2. Girls in Trouble - July 2007.

3. Second Chance Mom - June 2007.

4. The Bad Mother's Handbook - May 2007.

5. The Mistress's Daughter - April 2007.

6. Somebody's Daughter - March 2007.

7. The Girls - February 2007.

8. Singing Bird - January 2007.

//
Photo Credit: Book Cover taken by Jenna Hatfield.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Julie [Member] · http://web.mac.com/juliebot
Jenna,
You mentioned letters (from the potential adoptive parents) inappropriately addressed to the "birthmother". I totally get your objection to referring to a woman as a "birthmother" before she has placed her child for adoption. However, potential adoptive parents are instructed by the agencies to write a "Dear Birthmother" letter (with "Dear Birthmother" as the title). How would you suggest adoptive parents address the potential future birthmother to their potential child?
I must admit, in the three months prior to our son's birth, I felt a little uncomfortable referring to our future birthmother as a "birthmother", but I didn't know a more appropriate term to use.
-Julie
PermalinkPermalink 09/25/07 @ 02:01
Comment from: Jenna Hatfield [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
Julie; It's still inappropriate, whether agencies are instructing potential families to address them as such or not. I am not a fan of agencies (for the most part; I do know of one that I like in our local-ish area) so using that as a justification doesn't really fly with me. Agencies are interested, for the most part, in getting mothers to place their babies so that the money keeps flowing to keep their business afloat. When it comes down to it, without placements, they sink. They know that preemptive strikes against an expectant mother's psyche to remove that connection she has or could have with her child serves them best. (Not the mother best, or even the family best, but them best.) By referring to a mother as a birth mother prior to the signing of the Termination of Parental Rights, agencies are hoping to drive home to the mother that she is nothing more than a "birth mother." She is already such before that moment of signing has come, according to the agency rhetoric.

Families wishing to adopt that are looking to go for the most ethical manner of treatment of mothers and fathers could simply address their letters to: "Dear Mother and Father." If that's "too risque" for some, "Dear Expectant Mother and Father Considering Adoption" could work. But why are the determiners needed when, at that time, they are the only parents? They're not. Again, it "sounds weird" only because agencies have made the unethical version the acceptable format.

It's such a sad, sad thing that agencies are continuing to push this line of thinking not only on the waiting families they are working with but on unsuspecting mothers and fathers who are trying to make a hard enough decision as it is. Both sides are being treated poorly by this unethical practice. Such a sad, sad thing.
PermalinkPermalink 09/25/07 @ 11:00
Comment from: Julie [Member] · http://web.mac.com/juliebot
I completely get the problems with referring to them as "birthmothers" prior to the birth and placement of the child.

I do believe the agency we used was one of the more ethical agencies, in that the expectant mothers had their own social workers who were their advocates, who counseled them and made sure they knew their rights. In fact, they told us, as potential adoptive parents that their priority was the needs and desires of the expectant mothers, to make sure they are true to their feelings and are making the decision they want to make. And they told us they will not pressure the woman to place the child for adoption. It must be 100% her decision. I was pretty surprised by that, but I'm glad that is their priority.
Still, had I known then what I know now, I would have addressed my letter as "Dear Expectant Mother Considering Adoption" rather than "Dear Birthmother".
PermalinkPermalink 09/26/07 @ 03:01
Comment from: Jenna Hatfield [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
Julie; bless your agency! They went above and beyond what so many others do nowadays. They are to be commended. Send them a pat on the back for me.

I think a lot of parents (who adopted) realize the error in a lot of what they were counseled to do by an agency or by information that was previously available on the internet. The gradual (and needed!) shift towards a more ethical process is awakening some to issues that they'd like to change if they adopt again. And that's the point of continuing to speak out about these things. :) It's a good thing to keep discussing all of them! WOO!

PermalinkPermalink 09/26/07 @ 07:39
Comment from: Deb Donatti [Member] Email · http://open.adoptionblogs.com
Jenna, I just read this one. I had ordered it from the local library back in August, but had to wait for them to apparently "pony express" it to the branch.
Very interesting read, but I did not like they way that she just sort of left you hanging at the end. Something that you spend the whole story building up to/in anticipation of (the reunion) deserved more than one chapter.
PermalinkPermalink 10/22/07 @ 17:13
Comment from: Jenna Hatfield [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
Good point, Deb. I'm not sure, however, what would have been a better ending. I wanted more, too, but what KIND of more? Hmm.
PermalinkPermalink 10/22/07 @ 20:26
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Categories

http://www.omnitrace.com

Misc

Subscribe to Birth-First Parent Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 118