Birth-First Parent Blog

11/10/06

Birthmothers Around the World: A Look at Korea

Posted by : Jenna Hatfield in Birth-First Parent Blog at 07:34 pm , 612 words, 209 views  
Categories: Current News, Articles, Documentaries, Birth Parents Around the World
Goodness, I love technology. I stumbled across this gem tonight while searching for new adoption feeds. It's an article in The Korea Times that features a DVD about the birthmothers (from Korea) that were forced, unwillingling, to place their children for adoption.

The DVD itself is called Resilience. The story gets more and more interesting as we're introduced to a Pastor who runs a guesthouse (for lack of a better word) for adoptees returning to Korea to search for their birthmothers and answers to their questions. The Pastor then contacted a Korean adoptee from the US to produce the documentary as he felt an adoptee would have a bond with a birthmother while he was simply an outsider.

The documentary itself sounds fascinating:

"Resilience" finally gives birthmothers who had to give up their child a voice about being single mothers, international adoption practices and society. The documentary allows them to contemplate this serious, but often ignored and misrepresented, social issue in Korea. The personal stories about how and what happened are sometimes shocking and very emotional to the women.

SPONSOR
http://www.omnitrace.com/Birth-Family.html


It sounds like a tear-jerker to me. Even worse is what I'm briefly learning about Korean culture from this short little article. From the sounds of it, single parenting is frowned upon even more than in our society. (For those who are about to argue, "Oh, but single parenting is so accepted here!" I'll beg to differ.) Sad, really.

The Rev. Kim continues, "Until the 70s poverty was the main reason for sending babies and children abroad for adoption. Nowadays, almost 98 percent of the babies and children are from single mothers." Single mothers are hardly accepted in Korean society.


Simply placing a child for the sole reason that you can't be a single parent in a country is so disturbing to me that I can't begin to comprehend. Yes, the stigma of single parenthood in my small-minded area of origin was one of the factors in Munchkin's placement yet it wasn't the only reason. Nor was it the main reason.

We complain about how difficult government assistance is in our country. And it is difficult. During my pregnancy, I had to fight tooth and nail to keep my medical coverage for the pregnancy, which they took away twice because of technical errors on their side. However, facts like the following leave me thinking that our system is flowing with gold:

The single-mother houses are the only government support single mothers receive and they can only stay there for two years, during their pregnancy and one year after birth; after that there is no more support.


I don't know. Perhaps if we gave families two years, exactly, to get on their feet, we'd have less abuses of the welfare system as we currently see it happening. Yet, at the same time, what about the families who legitimately need these resources. Ohio just raised our minimum wage, thank the Good Lord. Perhaps people will be able to actually live on this "living wage." Who knows.

The documentary is set to be finished in 2007. After that?

"I hope this documentary can also help and inform adoptive parents in western countries, social workers and Korean and western society." However, "In the first place the documentary is for adoptees and birthmothers. For the premiere we want to invite many birthmothers and we plan to travel with "Resilience" to Europe and America to screen it to adoptee organizations. I hope it will help adoptees with a question to find an answer."


I hope it gives them answers as well. And I hope, in the process, these birthmothers find their peace. I can't wait to see this one for myself.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: mcewen [Member] Email
Your 'bio' states that you are a beginner, but in my humble opinion, you are a professional, on too many levels to list. My hat goes off to you.
Best wishes to you and yours [translation = you and your family]
http://whitterer-autism.blogspot.com
PermalinkPermalink 11/10/06 @ 20:12
Comment from: Jan Baker [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
In my generation of birth moms, being single was often the ONLY factor that made adoption the choice du jour. I know deveral women whose families offered the father a quickie divorce if only he would marry their daughter and stay married long enough for the baby to be born.

Good find Jenna!
PermalinkPermalink 11/10/06 @ 21:08
Comment from: JudyK [Member] Email · http://justenjoyhim.wordpress.com/
Reasons for placement in other countries is really fascinating; culture dictates a lot of it, I think. And yes, while our culture doesn't accept unwed mothers, in Asia -- at least in Vietnam and I believe in other countries in Asia as well -- it's simply to a much greater extent, to an extent that I don't think as Westerners we can comprehend. So, in an "all things are relative" way, our cultural values would indicate that our culture is simply not as punishing to unwed mothers as other cultures are. And to some "not as punishing" might equal "more accepting."

Case in point -- in researching (I'm constantly researching adoption and Vietnam), I came across an article titled "Single motherhood legalized in Vietnam" and dated June 12, 2000. The web link is: http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0WDQ/is_2000_June_12/ai_62708837
(hope that works). My first thought -- what?! Single motherhood legalized?? How could it be illegal?! Well, it was considered illegal for a woman to be an unwed mother. The article said: "So far, children born to an unmarried couple were discriminated against, for instance, when applying for social welfare benefits. The amendments make the children of single mothers equal to those born to married parents."

Well, no wonder pregnant unwed women relinquished their babies for adoption -- what a burden for their children and for them to carry for the rest of their lives. And even with a law in place, that doesn't mean that societal values will automatically follow suit.

The reasons behind a mother placing her child for adoption are, I think, so complex and often have more layers than most people know. When we're talking about a completely different culture, we have to try to think in terms of their values, and that's next to impossible. Interesting topic.
PermalinkPermalink 11/10/06 @ 21:12
Comment from: Jenna Hatfield [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
Thanks Judy. I'll use that one as well in the near future.

Jan; true.

Mcewen; Well, thanks! :)
PermalinkPermalink 11/11/06 @ 07:45
Comment from: JudyK [Member] Email · http://justenjoyhim.wordpress.com/
Jenna, you're welcome. It just boggled my mind; at the same time, it explained a lot. Sad, though, so sad. Imagine your entire self being "illegal" --- I don't know if I even have words to express how that might feel. Truly renders me speechless. But it is so very very sad.

In our own adoption story -- not speaking for anyone else, of course -- I believe that's the main reason why Nate was relinquished, that his birthmother was unwed and in her letter to the orphanage it was made clear that the birthfather wasn't in the picture anymore. Finances were addressed as well, and I know that poverty is also one of the main reasons. In Nate's Danh Tu's (mother in Vietnamese) case, though -- she was a college student so I don't think the poverty was debilitating. I think it was the societal values against unwed mothers and illegitimate (How I hate that word) children.

Anyways . . . .
PermalinkPermalink 11/11/06 @ 07:57
Comment from: thirdmom [Member] Email
Jenna, reading this late - I just found it from a link on one of your recent posts.

I've had the opportunity to meet and talk to Korean mothers on two occasions while traveling in Korea. I am absolutely convinced that Korean culture simply provides no realistic opportunities for unmarried women to parent their children. Every mother I have heard speak has stressed the hopelessness of their situation. They simply had no other alternatives. I'm hoping that "Resilience" raises awareness of their situation and leads to real change, not lip service, but the kind of change that will make parenting their children truly possible.
PermalinkPermalink 02/24/07 @ 20:58
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Categories

Misc

Subscribe to Birth-First Parent Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 109