Birth-First Parent Blog

08/06/07

Article Touches on Realities of Open Adoption

Posted by : Jenna Hatfield in Birth-First Parent Blog at 12:13 pm , 850 words, 391 views  
Categories: Articles
Open Doors are Okay It's a long read. It's not an easy read. It's a necessary read. Parts One and Two of an open adoption story were featured in the LA Times yesterday and today. All too frequently, adoptive and birth parents who are participating in open adoptions hear, "Well, we'll have to wait until the kids are older to hear what they say." This open adoption started in 1983. The birth mother, adoptive mother and adoptee all speak in this piece. You want to know? Read it.

If anything, the stories of these three women show us some important things: consistency and communication are key in an open adoption. Not only are those things key between adults when the child is too young to make decisions but when the child reaches an age to become involved in the decision making process. We see, time and time again throughout this article, a lack in consistency, which only further exacerbates problems with communication. It creates hard feelings, anger, disappointment, distrust and fear on the parts of all involved.

I had to take breaks in reading the accounts of the past twenty-four years. (Sixteen pages total amongst the two days.) I got overwhelmed with the problems that they encountered after Kendall was old enough to voice an opinion and, later, rebel. My mind became anxious and fraught with worry. "Will this happen to us? Is this what path we're heading down? Is this the only outcome?" Logically, of course, I understand that all situations are different. But before I made it to the end of the lengthy two part article, my heart was heavy.

No, the story isn't all rainbows and butterflies. There are some hard-fought battles within the pages and years. But, as I said earlier, we want to hear what the adoptees who were raised in open adoptions have to say, right? No one says it better than Kendall herself.

"Open adoption really helped me understand who I am — where I came from, why I am the person I am," she said. It had helped her know she hadn't been rejected because something was wrong with her. She could ask Patti herself over and over: Why had Patti given her up? Over and over, Patti could explain: She put Kendall up for adoption for Kendall's own good.

Knowing this did not take away a sense of loss, but because of open adoption, she felt loved by both of her families. Without open adoption, she might never have known that love.

SPONSOR


My anxiety started to lift a little at this point, even knowing differences in words would be used for our own situation. The truth is that open adoptions hope to make this point to the adoptee: you have been always loved by all those in your life. It doesn't take away the losses (for anyone) but hopes to reiterate that love. Knowing that adoptees are beginning to walk away from adolescence, however dramatic in form, with this knowledge is encouraging.

Furthermore, the two mothers (as they're described in the captions of pictures) have also been able to put past mistakes behind them and, on the last page of day two's article, we are able to see other rewards of open adoption. Apologies exchanged, hearts mended. No, neither had always been perfect with regard to communication or consistency. Both had suffered hurt feelings, personally and out of fierce loyalty to the daughter in question. And yet, the achieved the goal in mind.

As I said, it's a hard read. I found myself struggling to get through it. Quite frankly, I would rather have painted Kendall's birth mother as a more stable person but that's not the reality of their personal story. For those who read this and think, "But I would never be that unstable," perhaps use this story as a catalyst to really make sure that you continue to be a consistent and stable figure in your placed child's life. For adoptive families dealing with unstable birth parents, perhaps use this story as a reminder that patience and long term goals can be accomplished with appropriate boundaries.

It's scary to realize that all of the hard work that we've done thus far amounts to almost nothing in the grand scheme of what is yet to come. However, I am still encouraged by the fact that we have laid down the proper ground work and will continue forward with the ultimate goal in mind: unconditionally loving that Munchkin.

There will be a chat at 3:00 PM PACIFIC TIME on the LA Time's website via this link about the article itself, open adoption and any other issues that come up. If you have a comment on how the article was handled (seriously, have you ever seen such a well-researched and covered piece in today's media?) or open adoption in general, consider joining the chat.

//
For more on open adoption, read:

1. The Secret Fears of Birth Parents.

2. How Birth Parents Can Properly Communicate the Hard Stuff.

3. One True Benefit to Children from Open Adoption.

4. New Support Venue for Open Adoption Families.

5. Fears for Birth Parents Regarding Visits.

//
Photo Credit.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: mariah [Member] Email
Kendall had to rebel against two sets of parents, three if you count Donna. It's pretty clear to me that open adoption with contact was not in the best interest of this particular child. The will of the adults in the situation was imposed on a little girl who just wanted security and to know where she belonged. I question the damage done to her siblings, also. The additional pressure of 'working things out' compounded every struggle all involved had to cope with.

This is not to say that I believe in closed adoptions, or that no fully open adoption can work. It supports my belief that the degree of contact cannot, and should not, be mandated through any sort of contract, state, or federal law.

Children's lives are too fragile to play with.
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 14:04
Comment from: Jenna Hatfield [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
Amazing how you read it and get that particular point of view when the "child" herself has a completely different viewpoint. LOL.
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 14:57
Comment from: Crazed [Member] Email
It really does show that OA is just like any other relationship - up and down and requiring a lot of work from all sides.

People baulk when I suggest that OA is like a marriage – but the reality of it is that it really is…it’s a life long commitment, full of complications and joy, peppered with emotions from many different sides.

Many of the comments I’ve read from both sides of the OA issue only solidifies my stance that OA, while often presented as the easy answer, is, in reality, not easy nor is it the answer for every situation…and of course, as long as agencies are still collecting mid-level five figure fees to not do a bit of education on it…it will continue to be that way.
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 15:15
Comment from: John [Member] Email
Mariah, well said. Adoption has traditionally been seen as a 'fresh start' for the child. It was not supposed to be the same cast of characters with two new faces added. Adoption is not some grand social experiment.

With this particular birth mother and open adoption, the child went through immense turmoil throughout childhood, that didn't need to be there. How much wiser to have the child go through these very difficult events as an adult, and not destroy her childhood with highly emotional events that she was not equiped to handle as a child. John
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 15:35
Comment from: Jenna Hatfield [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
Adoption is not some grand social experiment.

Neither is parenting but even the best parents make mistakes in deciding what is and isn't best for their child at any given time. In the words of my therapist, there is no one book on parenting. When it comes to open adoption parenting, there are even less resources; just wide-mouthed people willing to spew opinions. These people did the best with what they had available, just like any other parent.

PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 15:52
Comment from: Crazed [Member] Email
Mariah,

I encourage you to come listen to the adoptee herself, rather than putting words in her mouth about how bad her experience was for her.

She is in the LATimes chat right now.

Please, feel free to join us and read what she has to say about how OA impacted her...since my own OA experience is often written off as a fluke.
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 16:36
Comment from: Deb Donatti [Member] Email · http://open.adoptionblogs.com
I have always believed that open adoption could be a benefit to some children, but this belief that it should work well for every situation is not realistic.
How many have gone into an open adoption only to discover that the other participants were either unable or unwilling to learn and grow through the process? This could apply to birthparents who have had contact unfairly withdrawn, just as much as adoptive parents who have had birthparents abandon the relationship.
The involved adults need to have the ability and maturity to keep the relationship of open adoption functioning, and that is sadly not always possible.
Allowing the child to be witness to the struggles and adult issues is disruptive for the child, and it shouldn't happen if you can avoid it. The adults need to be able to work things out together, but unfortunately one can not force the other to meet that responsibility.
I agree that people should consider open adoption. They should go into the relationship with an open mind and heart. I also feel though, that if things do not follow that perfect imagined pattern of what an open adoption relationship should be, (and by whose standards), no one has a right to judge that as somehow wrong. For some of us it works out better than we could have imagined, for others the disappointment is very real, and raw.
Open adoption is a very different kind of family relationship, and as far as I know there is not way to tell what is going to work for everyone, every situation is so different. Being different is not a bad thing. Open adoption can work well, but trying and failing to achieve the contact you imagined does not make the people involved bad either.
Can we repeat ‘every situation is unique’ over and over?. There is just no way to set a standard rule that will work for everyone, or to accurately predict who is going to be able to make it work out, and who isn’t. I wish there was.
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 16:57
Comment from: AdoptionBlogs Editor [Member] Email · http://editor.adoptionblogs.com
While I encourage open and honest discussions, I have to draw the line when it gets to be more like personal attacks than sharing and expressing personal opinions. You can all share your opinions without name-calling. If I see more of it, I will continue to delete it.
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 17:57
Comment from: loveajax [Member] Email
I always like reading stories about open adoption.

Anyway, I wanted to read the live chat...I can't seem to get into that. Once it was over, is there no way to access it?

I was a little concerned to see the "statistics" about adoptees (newborn infant) "needing" special education and counseling at a FAR greater rate than non adoptees. I had never seen those statistics before.
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 17:58
Comment from: soblessed [Member] Email
Deb

Well put :)

PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 18:26
Comment from: Jenna Hatfield [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
I also feel though, that if things do not follow that perfect imagined pattern of what an open adoption relationship should be, (and by whose standards), no one has a right to judge that as somehow wrong.

From your own words then, we, as an adoption triad or members of society in general, have no right to say that this is an example of things gone wrong or sit smugly and say, "If it was me, I would have closed the adoption." By their own accounts (meaning, birth mother, adoptive mother and adoptee) in the chat this afternoon/evening (depending what coast you are on), they feel that their open relationship, while peppered with miscommunication and issue, was beneficial to all involved. (I'll be blogging on the chat tomorrow. Too much laundry left to do this evening!)

If the family itself can make it through the "perfect imagined pattern," then why can't others realize that the first hint of issue isn't a reason to walk away (on the side of the birth parents) or close the adoption (on the side of the adoptive family). These people learned things the hard way and shared their experiences with us.

They are an inspiration. They are braver than many because they offered to share the positives AND negatives. They walked the walk. They are trail-blazers. They did it without help. And they deserve more than being told that what they did was wrong.
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 18:28
Comment from: happygmom [Member] Email
As Kendall's adoptive parents struggled to understand how very different she is from them and as her first parents struggled to understand that they were not the people in Kendall's life to provide her the stability that she needed, I was 100% in Kendall's corner, hoping that she would be able to find her center while being drawn to both of her sets of parents, neither being ideal for her. I admire Kendall and her family for sharing this amazing story of life and it compromises.

Jenna - I found your comments as moving as Kendall's story of her experience as an adoptee. Although you are the mother of still young children, I found your insight into Kendall's family dynamics mature and sensitive. You will be a great Mom to teenagers! I would like to add one comment to what I read about Kendall. If I may quote you, "Quite frankly, I would rather have painted Kendall's birth mother as a more stable person but that's not the reality of their personal story." I would like add (having raised two children to their mid-20's - one very like me, one not) - "Quite frankly, I would rather have painted Kendall's parents (adoptive - added for clarity) as more sensitive to the reality of Kendall's genetic nature and not as people who tried to force her into the mold of their family." I think that they "got it" but not until after they spent some frustrating years following the conventional adoption wisdom of "as if born to".

Janet
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 18:38
Comment from: mariah [Member] Email
Excellent comment, Deb. Our adoptions began as semi-open, became fully open (at my urging). One ended up being closed, the other is still open. That is the background I'm coming from, and that's what I brought to the table when I read the story. I wasn't able to listen to the chat.

My OWN experience is what led my point of view. What my nearly grown children tell me has reinforced it. All I'm saying is--each family needs to come to their own conclusions about what to do.
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 18:47
Comment from: Jenna Hatfield [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
Just to quote myself really quick:

" Logically, of course, I understand that all situations are different.

In fact, I don't ever state that this story is the be-all and end-all of how all adoptions should progress. The closest, which isn't even remotely close, I get to even an assumption that all adoptions should always be open is when I say:

perhaps use this story as a reminder that patience and long term goals can be accomplished with appropriate boundaries.

Note that I state that adoptive parents DO need to set those appropriate boundaries. I'm of the opinion that some could have been used here. I've never said that x-boundary is necessary in x-kind of adoption. I've always stated that every situation is different. The use of the word "perhaps" is a way of suggesting, "Before you consider x-reaction to x-problem, maybe you should consider y-thing or z-outcome." I didn't say, "It must be done this way." Perhaps is a way of saying, "This might help you, it might not, give it a whirl or at least a consideration."

This is simply a story of how families can get through the hardship without giving up or closing an adoption. I'm sorry if others don't want to hear that you can do it, that we want to see people give up and continue the cycle of hurt. But this family? Didn't. And they deserve the pat on the back. No one was damaged for life (again, which I'll be quoting the words from the family directly tomorrow). They all, adoptee included, approve of the open relationship, acknowledging that communication issues hindered certain progress and had that been addressed, certain hardships could have been avoided.

Don't speak for me. I say what I mean. ;)
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 18:53
Comment from: soblessed [Member] Email
"All I'm saying is--each family needs to come to their own conclusions about what to do. "

This is EXACTLY what is needed, Mariah, IMO. No one choice works for any family and respecting someone's choice to research all options and then choose the fit that is best for their unique situation is critical. Without that, it just degenerates into "I'm right", "No, I'M right" and so on. What does that accomplish except to make others defensive?

PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 19:04
Comment from: Jenna Hatfield [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
Please see comment above yours.
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 19:06
Comment from: soblessed [Member] Email
"Perhaps is a way of saying, "This might help you, it might not, give it a whirl or at least a consideration." "

Exactly :)

"I'm sorry if others don't want to hear that you can do it, that we want to see people give up and continue the cycle of hurt."

Jenna, I didn't get that impression reading the comments. Did I miss something?
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 19:09
Comment from: Coley S. [Member] Email · http://open.adoptionblogs.com
It was a very hard read but I agree that it was a well researched article. I enjoyed the fact that they enclosed some of the letters written between them over the years.

The quote you quoted was my favorite part of the whole article.
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 21:09
Comment from: Heather [Member] Email · http://unproductivereproduction.blogspot.com
I thought the article was an intense, but definitely worthwhile read. I am grateful to families like these who not only pioneered open adoption, but are now sharing honestly about their experiences.

I attended the live chat this afternoon. One of the most striking things to me was that they all felt that openness had been the right for them. Even when people asked them pretty directly if some of their struggles (especially Kendall's) had resulted from the openness, they said no. There were things they would have done differently within the openness, but the never questioned the openness itself for their family.
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 23:30
Comment from: Heather [Member] Email · http://unproductivereproduction.blogspot.com
(Sorry about the crazy italics at the end there!)
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 23:30
Comment from: happygmom [Member] Email
HeatherS - thanks for the feedback about the chat. I am happy to hear that the family was able to get their point across about feelings about openness in their family.

Janet
PermalinkPermalink 08/07/07 @ 05:03
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

http://www.omnitrace.com

Misc

Subscribe to Birth-First Parent Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 106