Birth-First Parent Blog

02/12/08

Another Celebrity Adopting? And More Skewed Comments!

Posted by : Jenna Hatfield in Birth-First Parent Blog at 10:25 am , 551 words, 552 views  
Categories: Current News
Apparently it's one of those weeks when adoption is high on my radar. My feed reader and inbox seem to be filled with adoption related material. Unfortunately all of this material seems to be rubbing me the wrong way. As if we needed more proof that the general public doesn't understand adoption from any angle, comments from a celebrity and a parenting blogger just drove it home a little more for me this morning.

I normally don't have a problem with celebrities adopting. Or, maybe I should clarify. I don't have a problem with celebrities adopting as long as they have educated themselves and aren't spouting silly or wrong adoption facts to the paparazzi that hound them on a daily basis. Because the general public gets their news from these media sources and when those reporters are fed inaccuracies so is your average reader.

And so, today's little news bit.

It's been in the rumor mill that Gwyneth Paltrow and Coldplay singer husband Chris Martin have been considering adoption. I tend to stay away from rumor mill gossip until either the child is adopted or the star steps out on a limb and says something about the rumors. Unfortunately the latter came true as Paltrow had something to say about adoption. Commence with the rubbing in the wrong direction.

"We might get one from Brooklyn. No baby is more helpless than another baby. And I'm a New York Girl."

SPONSOR


So many things with that statement smack of either a total lack of education or a total misstatement on her part. (Believe me, I've said things that sound completely off the mark from what I'm trying to say!) I'd love to give her the benefit of the doubt as I think Paltrow is a rather classy lady. I'll reserve my super scathing remarks in case she says something super ridiculous again.

But it gets better. A blogger that covered the piece rubbed me the wrong way as well. With a brillo pad.

But then again, I'm biased--I think the best of pretty much everything can be found in Brooklyn, and that includes babies!


Sigh.

Children are not something to be found. Children are not objects. Adoption is not about finding babies for parents. It is about finding parents for babies. And, even then, it should only be done if the original family absolutely cannot parent. It really, really bugs me that our children, our adoptees are continually spoken of as objects to be given and received. I find it frustrating and disheartening.

I can only hope that Paltrow and Martin will go about adoption in the most educated and ethical way possible. If they do adopt, I can only hope that child will be loved unconditionally as any birth mother would hope for her own child, placed or parented. I can only hope that others will understand that children are not commodities to be handed to and fro. I can only hope that as other families (adoptive and birth) speak out about who they are and who their children are that the general public will gain an understanding of what is an is not true about adoption itself.

(I won't even get started on the comments about a "better" life. Sigh.)

//
For more on celebrities and adoption, read these posts.


Photo Credit.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: MamaS [Member] Email
When I was doing adoption preparation classes there was a couple who were adopting from the Philippines. At that time babies were flowing like water from Korea and India so everyone was surprised and puzzled that this Caucasian couple was pursuing a very slow and difficult adoption journey through the Philippines.
The wife explained that her husband agreed to adopt only if they could get really beautiful children. He had researched and decided that the most beautiful children in the world came from the Philippines. The proof? More "Miss Universes" have come from there than any other country! To him, it was logical!
PS: They ended up with a "beautiful" baby BOY!
PermalinkPermalink 02/12/08 @ 13:01
Comment from: Jenna Hatfield [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
MamaS; augh. Granted, people birth and parent children for all kinds of wrong reasons. I'm sure people have even had children together on reasons based on genetic chances for a good-looking kid. Neither case, birthing or adopting for reasons of beauty, are either less tacky though. Ick ick.
PermalinkPermalink 02/12/08 @ 13:04
Comment from: bunnygirl [Member]
I'm a prospective adoptive parent & I've got to say I kind of cringe now when I hear about celebrities adopting! A lot of ignorant people assume that couples decide to adopt from certain countries because someone rich & famous has or they assume that adopting a baby is a "trend" now. I assure you, I don't know ANYBODY personally who has not put an incredible amount of thought into the decision. As for how the baby "looks" that's just ridiculous, as far as I'm concerned. I may be coming at this from a slightly different perspective because in addition to fertility treatments & miscarriages, my husband & I lost a son at term, during labor, but to me just being able to hold a living child in my arms will be a blessing & a miracle. Who cares what he or she looks like??? It's not like most of us are fashion models, anyway, and who knows what the future will bring? Not all beautiful, healthy, children stay that way forever, accidents & sickness happen & what mother, adoptive or birth, would reject a child because he or she no was no longer perfect? I just really, truly hope that this sort of article doesn't make even more people assume that ALL prospective adoptive parents are shallow,, narcissistic idiots!
PermalinkPermalink 02/17/08 @ 11:00
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Categories

Click Here to Visit www.pamelaobr.com

Misc

Subscribe to Birth-First Parent Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 124