Birth-First Parent Blog

01/03/08

Adoption Doesn't Solve Everything

Posted by : Jenna Hatfield in Birth-First Parent Blog at 11:37 am , 991 words, 511 views  
Categories: Articles
Everyone has an opinion on Jamie Lynn Spears' pregnancy. I do. You do. Even if you say you don't, choosing not to have an opinion is actually an opinion. Some people are shocked to the idea that, gasp, sixteen year old girls can get pregnant. Some people are angry that a girl that was (previously) a role model for teens and tweens got herself in this pickle. Some people are praising her for her "pro-life decision." Ironically, people in that same grouping are taking a different view and chastising her for getting pregnant in the first place.

I've talked about it briefly. I thought I was done talking about it. Then I had to go ahead and read this during my morning coffee routine. What a way to start my day. I mean, I love nothing more than the uneducated glorification of adoption before I've fully digested even one cup of steamy hot caffeine-laden goodness!

The blog-article was fine for awhile. It's fine to question how Spears' pregnancy will have an effect on her young fans. She is a role model for young girls. Asking those questions is not only intelligent but most likely necessary. (Though I've previously linked to a blog that covered this discussion!) That was all fine and dandy. But then I got to this paragraph.

I am torn about this because I feel like by being a role model to thousands of young girls, it is kind of her duty to address it with them. Part of me thinks she should place the baby for adoption. After all, there are plenty of couples out there who can also provide for a baby and give it a good life. Then, part of me thinks she is acting as a role model by taking responsibility and keeping the baby. That does not mean that I believe people who place their babies for adoption are not being responsible. In fact, I believe it's quite the contrary--it takes a courageous, strong person to give their baby up for adoption. It's the ultimate act of love.

SPONSOR
http://omnitrace.com/


I mean, I knew it was coming. I've felt an adoption push lurking in the shadows since Spears announced her pregnancy. I've been waiting for someone to use this as a way to drive it home. No, not the fact that sixteen year olds are awful young to take on such responsibility but that there are "plenty of couples" available to raise these children. While this particular author didn't start a smear campaign against the mothers that choose to place, the whole line of "the ultimate act of love" is gag-worthy.

Not that I don't love my placed daughter. Not that the birth mothers I know and regularly converse with don't love their placed children. We do. Beyond a shadow of a doubt. But it's tiring and not always true to be constantly painted as the courageous, strong person. And yes, some chose to place out of love. Many others were coerced or lead to believe that what they had to offer was not enough and would never be enough.

Of course, the author addressed the past wrongs in the adoption industry.

Society has come a long way. There was a time in this country when if you got pregnant and you were a teenager, your family sent you away and forced you to give the child up for adoption. There was no discussion...do not pass go, do not collect $200...you were sent to the home for unwed girls and came home to resume your life as if it never happened. That is what happened to my mom, and thousands like her during the 50s & 60s.


And so, I'm lead to believe by the vague reference that this woman's mother was a birth mother from that era. I do not know, however, whether or not the author is the placed child or a child raised after placement. Even still, the author neglects to address the fact that while there are options for today's unplanned pregnancies and often discussions between family members, the unethical standards employed by many of the adoption agencies don't offer mothers who contact said agencies a real and informed choice.

Yes, changes and advances have been made. But can you imagine the drama if Spears chose to place her child? Sit back and think about it for a little bit. While there are some people calling her some unsavory names now, just think what people would say about her if she chose to place her child. I mean, there are those that will tell anyone with a pair of ears and eyes that all birth parents, regardless of circumstance, are not worth their weight in gold. They are all dysfunctional, useless human beings who do not deserve any form of respect. And there would be those in this country (and others) who would treat her the same way that I have been treated, regardless of her fame.

There are no easy answers when a woman experiences an unplanned pregnancy. I think, even more so for Spears, she's got a full plate of decisions coupled with the scrutiny of the public. Sixteen year olds get pregnant all the time, they're just not usually dinner table discussion for the majority of the country. She is a teen who got pregnant and she's dealing with the consequences of those actions. She is choosing to parent, which is her right, no matter what Joe Blow says over the water cooler at work. If she was choosing to place, she'd have a whole separate group of dissenters.

As I said before, we can only hope that her pregnancy is uneventful so that she can focus on getting all of her ducks in a row. Children, placed or parented, change everything. Here's hoping it's a positive change for the entire family.

//
For more, read:

1. Celbrities, Unplanned Pregnancies and This Birth Mother.

2. My Heart Can Empathize.

//
Photo Credit.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: John [Member] Email
Maybe its different with girls, by non of my sons was even close to being emotionally competent to parent at 16. She not only gets to parent, she has to deal with the media who will pick apart every choice she makes. Good luck to her. You are right, she would be seen as a bad decsion maker no matter which choice she made. She needs privacy and being out of the spotlight. John
PermalinkPermalink 01/03/08 @ 14:05
Comment from: Jenna Hatfield [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
John; I don't think that I was emotionally competent at sixteen but, then again, I wasn't faced with it at sixteen either. That said, I can't imagine my brother parenting at sixteen. Or eighteen. Someday? Maybe. ;) Privacy would do the whole family a world of good.
PermalinkPermalink 01/03/08 @ 14:48
Comment from: erin_d_a [Member] Email
The whole thing is sad. I'm glad she is parenting. She obviously has the financial resources to do so, she has a mother that seems to support this, she has a boyfriend that if he doesn't end up in jail seems to support this, and can hire help if she feels she needs it. She is in a very lucky position indeed. I think it would be silly for her to place just because she was sixteen. I know sixteen year olds who turned out to be great parents. She'll probably never face one of the biggest drawbacks of being a teen mother which is poverty. I also don't want to see adoption further "glamorized" in the media or made out to be a selfless decision which is what would happen if she placed her baby for adoption. I honestly think the only people that would be raising a stink would be the ones in the adoption reform circles. The media would love it, she'd be on the front page of People talking about her "brave" and "self-less" decision and I might throw up into my cheerios. I do wish she hadn't gotten pregnant because it is sending VERY mixed messages to young girls. My twelve year old cousin has been talking about becoming a mom since she was ten. She seriously wants to be a mom, like now, and I was talking to her on the phone about this, and she was all excited because "Zoe 101" can do it, why can't she. Her fans can't see all the advantages that she has, and I fear that such a young girl, from such a tabloid friendly family, successfully teen parenting is going to send some mixed messages to kids whose parents don't interact with them enough on sexual issues anyways. But I do wish her luck. I hope that she makes a wonderful parent and I'm thankful that she didn't have a public abortion and that she is choosing to parent.
PermalinkPermalink 01/03/08 @ 15:51
Comment from: ernest [Member] Email
On a side note, this Jamie Lynn Spears pregnancy kinda mirrored a funny movie currently in theaters called Juno which has been getting rave reviews and possible awards about a pregnant 16 year old in high school who planned to give up her baby for adoption. Though I haven't gone through any adoption experiences before, I feel that this movie depicts teenage pregnancy and also the anticipation of adoptive parents accurately though some jokes were a bit insensitive. Anyway whatever Ms Spears' decision is, I am glad that she chose life.
PermalinkPermalink 01/03/08 @ 23:28
Comment from: Jenna Hatfield [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
Ernest; I've written about Juno quite a few times already. I have no desire to see it as I don't find adoption to be a laughing matter in any way, shape or form. The writer has been extremely insensitive to birth parents and adoption has been described as "bizarre and unusual." Having read a spoiler review for the movie, knowing how it ends, I have no desire to subject myself to such propaganda.
PermalinkPermalink 01/04/08 @ 06:18
Comment from: JudyK [Member] Email · http://justenjoyhim.wordpress.com/
I feel for Jamie Lynn simply because I think she's in a d*mned if she does, d*mned if she doesn't situation. I don't, however, feel sorry for her. Big distinction. I don't think that bringing a child into the world is something that a woman needs to have people pity her over. And of course, I wish her the best.
PermalinkPermalink 01/04/08 @ 16:32
Comment from: Chromesthesia [Member] Email
I feel a bit bad for the girl, the Spears sisters in general. They can't really win. Also this whole a child would be better with a couple thing is starting to get under my skin HARDCORE. I believe a person has the right to decide what is best for their child, but it's not always best for a child to be raised by a couple instead of their biological mother JUST BECAUSE THEY ARE A COUPLE! That's another myth that needs to die. It's not healthy for the child or the mother and I hate that. Also, no more demonizing and canonizing birthmothers. It's not helpful at all.
PermalinkPermalink 01/06/08 @ 10:18
Comment from: eomaia [Member]
My mother married at 15, and had her first child at 17. It was the '50's, and they did just fine, and she lived to celebrate their 50th anniversary and see her great-grandchildren, which wouldn't have been the case if she'd waited until she was in her 20's to marry and have kids.

Now, we seem to view parenting like a competitive sport- like a baby is a gold medal, and only the BEST deserve one. There's also the attitude that all children deserve perfect childhoods, and that if you cannot guarantee a perfect childhood, you shouldn't have kids.
Yeah, right. How is a perfect childhood going to prepare a person for the realities of adult life? I think it's the parents' job to help a child through the rough spots in life, so that they'll know how to deal with hard times when they're out on their own.

I hope Jamie-Lynn finds the strength to make the choice that is best for her and her child, and not be bothered over judgmental people getting their panties in a bundle about her. I hope the same for Britney.
PermalinkPermalink 02/03/08 @ 15:35
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Related Discussions

    Misc

    Subscribe to Birth-First Parent Blog

     Enter your email address:
     

     

    Who's Online?

    • Guest Users: 118