Birth-First Parent Blog

05/06/07

Disappearing Birth Moms

Posted by : Jan Baker in Birth-First Parent Blog at 11:41 pm , 498 words, 166 views  
Categories: Open Adoption, Birth/First Parents


In discussing open adoption, I have found one fear that some adoptive parents have is that a birth mother may change her mind and decide to walk away. In fact, one of my readers, John, mentioned how damaging it could be for a child to have their birth parent cease contact. Although I have seen few statistics on this possibility, I know that it happens.

However, I am convinced that it does not happens enough to rule out an open adoption. In the April 27-29 USA Weekend magazine which comes in the Sunday newspaper in my locale, I noticed a similar topic in an advice column. Bad Mom vs. No Mom is not referring to a birth mother breaking her promises, but a divorced mother. The father wants advice as to whether he should try to end her custody rights. He mentions his son keeps going from "hopeful to hurt" over and over again.

SPONSOR
   123

No one wants to see their child get hurt. However, as the advice columnist points out, a child is better off having his mom in his life unless she is abusive. (I realize this situation is not exactly the same as a situation with a birth mother.) Professor of Family and Consumer Sciences at Western Michigan University, Karen Blaisure says that a child would rather face disappointment than lose a relationship with a parent.

Ms. Blaisure also says that teaching a child how to deal with such challenges will benefit a child more than cutting them off from someone they love. She also believes that helping a child learn to deal with such a situation can teach them valuable lessons in tolerance and forgiveness.

Protecting a child is part of our jobs as parents. Particularly with my youngest son, I know that there were times when I was probably overprotective of him. However, as he got older, I realized that overprotecting him from the realities of the world was actually a disservice to him. Children need to be prepared to live in the real world. Part of being a parent is helping our children learn from and face difficult challenges. Obviously, there are some harsh realities not appropriate for younger children.

However, in general, I do not believe that adopted children fare better with no contact from birth parents. If physical contact is impossible or unwise, even contact with birth family via mail or phone can be beneficial for children. Fewer birth mothers would cease contact if they received the support and encouragement to stay in touch with their children.

Whenever I hear of a birth mother considering stopping contact with her child, I cringe and hope that she changes her mind. However, even if some birth mothers do renege on their open adoption agreements, I do not think that is reason enough to fear an open adoption. I hear more frequently about adoptive parents closing an adoption than birth parents.

Suggested Reading:

Contact between families after adoption

Cooperative Adoption

Photo by Jan Baker 2007

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Coley S. [Member] Email · http://unplanned-pregnancy.adoptionblogs.com/
Well said Jan!
PermalinkPermalink 05/07/07 @ 09:09
Comment from: John [Member] Email
Jan, nice post. My position was yes for limited contact throughout childhood, but wait till 18 for frequent contact. Parenting is a balancing act. Too much protection can damage the child just like too little.

Two other points of view: My boys, who just might be influenced by me, are adamant that getting to have frequent contact and then ending it is bad (they lived through abandonment). The Therapist that I have used for the past 12 years is just as adamant that, as you said, the damage from abandonment loss does not dictate limiting contact. He has extensive experience working with adoptive families and kids. John
PermalinkPermalink 05/07/07 @ 13:00
Comment from: Jan Baker [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
I have to say John that I certainly understand why your sons are not wanting much contact. Of course, the frequency of contact has to do with what the birth parents are like a great deal.

Nice to know that your therapist agrees with me! You are fortunate to have a good adoption therapist - there are not that many around.
PermalinkPermalink 05/07/07 @ 23:07
Comment from: belkins [Member] Email
I am a first mother and there is a large segment of women who placed their children in "open" adoptions my daughter being one of them, that never get contact period for no reason given just that they can. Adoptive parents once the ink is dry have all the power we can be lied to, given misinformation, but that is too bad for us. We get treated like common criminals if we even ask for pictures and things that were agreed to and that is the saddest part of the whole picture. We who just want to know our children are ok and happy cannot get the pictures, updates, visits or whatever else is promised even if we do all that is required of us to get those privileges. I wish someone could tell me how an adoptive parent after 8 years in good conscience can keep denying a birth parent or natural parent the right to know about their own child especially since it is in the best interest of the child?
PermalinkPermalink 05/08/07 @ 08:56
Comment from: John [Member] Email
Belkins, that stinks. It is hard to imagine a reason not to at least exchange information. I am amazed at the number of states that do not recognize open agreements as enforceable. The child does need to know about you. Any possibility of using an intermediary to make the requests, and follow up if it doesn't happen?
PermalinkPermalink 05/08/07 @ 19:01
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Categories

http://www.omnitrace.com

Misc

Subscribe to Birth-First Parent Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 139